REVEALED.All studies

Deep study 01

The Word already was

John 1:1–18

The textual thesis

John’s own verbal sequence distinguishes the Word’s continuous existence from the coming-to-be of creation and from His later becoming flesh.

01

The first contrast

“Was” and “came into being” are not interchangeable

Start with the EnglishIn the beginning the Word was … all things came into being through Him … the Word became flesh.

The Greek is included only to show what wording the conclusion comes from. You do not need to read Greek to follow the explanation.

See the Greek wording

Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος … πάντα δι’ αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο … ὁ λόγος σὰρξ ἐγένετο

John repeatedly says the Word ‘was’ (ἦν) in John 1:1–2. In other words, when the beginning is in view, the Word already exists. John uses a different verb for what ‘came into being’ (ἐγένετο) through the Word and for what the Word later ‘became’ in verse 14.

The argument does not depend on importing a doctrine into the verbs. John places the Word in the ‘already was’ category (ἦν), while creation belongs to the ‘came into being’ category (ἐγένετο).

  • The Word: was (ἦν).
  • Creation: came into being (ἐγένετο).
  • Incarnation: became flesh (σὰρξ ἐγένετο).
  • The text says the Word became flesh, not that the Word began to exist.
02

The second contrast

“With God” and “the Word was God”

Start with the EnglishAnd the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

The Greek is included only to show what wording the conclusion comes from. You do not need to read Greek to follow the explanation.

See the Greek wording

καὶ ὁ λόγος ἦν πρὸς τὸν θεόν, καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος

The word translated ‘with’ (πρός) naturally expresses relationship here. John first distinguishes the Word (λόγος) from the God He is with, and then says that the Word was God (θεός).

The wording does not identify the Word as the same person He was with, nor does it call Him ‘a god.’ It attributes the nature and identity of God (θεός) to the Word while the previous phrase preserves relationship and distinction.

  • ‘With God’ prevents collapsing the Word into the person He is with.
  • ‘Was God’ prevents reducing the Word to a creature beside God.
  • John holds distinction and divine identity together in consecutive clauses.
03

The exclusion clause

John closes the created-being category

Start with the EnglishApart from Him not even one thing came into being that has come into being.

The Greek is included only to show what wording the conclusion comes from. You do not need to read Greek to follow the explanation.

See the Greek wording

χωρὶς αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο οὐδὲ ἕν. ὃ γέγονεν

John does not merely say that many things were made through the Word. He first says ‘all things’ (πάντα), and then rules out every exception by saying ‘not even one’ (οὐδὲ ἕν).

If the Word were Himself a thing that came into being, John’s categories would require Him to be made through Himself or to be the one unstated exception to a sentence explicitly denying exceptions. Neither qualification is supplied by the text.

04

The personal Word

John describes the Word as acting and relating

John’s descriptions show what ‘the Word’ (λόγος) means in this passage. The Word is with God, creates all things, contains life, enters the world He made, is rejected or received, becomes flesh, and displays glory.

These actions and relationships prepare John’s identification of the Word made flesh as the unique Son who makes the Father known.

What the text contributes

John’s sentence structure places the Word before the created order, in relationship with God, sharing the identity of God (θεός), and later entering creation by becoming flesh.

Keep the conclusion precise

01

The text explicitly says

The Word already was in the beginning, was with God, was God, made all created things, and later became flesh.

02

The text naturally implies

The Word’s existence precedes creation and is personally relational: He is with God and later makes the Father known.

03

What this passage does not establish by itself

John 1 establishes the Word’s preexistence, relationship with God, divine identity, creative work, and incarnation. It does not use later summary terms such as ‘Trinity,’ ‘person,’ or ‘one being in three persons’; those terms attempt to account for this passage together with the rest of Scripture.

Read this together with

John 17:5, 24Colossians 1:16–17Philippians 2:6–8Hebrews 1:2–3, 8–12

Sources and further verification

NET Bible: John 1 and textual notes